| Quote
: |
朱茂,顾星,彭劲,陈玲.㨰法的不同方向力度和周期观察[J].湖南中医药大学学报英文版,2017,37(5):523-525.[Click to copy
] |
|
| |
|
|
| This paper
：Browser 2754times Download 707times |
| 㨰法的不同方向力度和周期观察 |
| 朱茂,顾星,彭劲,陈玲 |
| (湖南中医药大学针灸推拿学院, 湖南 长沙 410208) |
| 摘要: |
| 目的 对比分析不同推拿水平层次测试者㨰法的不同方向力度大小和周期。方法 将选取的84例测试者分为初学组49例、实习组25例、教师组10例，利用SF-Ⅲ型智能推拿手法参数测定系统对其㨰法手法进行采集。测试者先在测力平台上练习，待其手法稳定后，嘱其操作1 min并采集㨰法参数。结果 教师组和实习组Z轴、X轴、Y轴的前摆和回摆力度均要大于初学组，教师组Z轴、Y轴的前摆和回摆力度大于实习组，比较均具有显著统计学差异（P<0.01）；而教师组X轴的前摆和回摆与实习组比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；实习组周期时间短于初学组，教师组的周期时间短于实习组，比较均具有显著统计学差异（P<0.01）。结论 教师组㨰法手法力度比实习组和初学组强且均匀、连贯、稳定；教师组周期时间比实习组和初学组短，频率快，刺激量更加强。该实验为㨰法教学提供了直观可视的波形图和客观参数。 |
| 关键词: 法 推拿手法测定系统 不同方向力度 周期 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-070X.2017.05.016 |
| Received:July 22, 2016 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Strength in Various Directions and Frequency of Rolling Manipulation |
| ZHU Mao,GU Xing,PENG Jin,CHEN Ling |
| (Acupuncture and Massage College, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410208, China) |
| Abstract: |
| Objective To compare strength in various directions and frequency of rolling manipulation at different levels of subjects. Methods The 84 subjects were divided into the learning group (49 cases), practice group (25 cases), teachers group (25 cases). SF-Ⅲ intelligent massage measurement system had been applied to collect rolling manipulation data. The subjects practiced rolling manipulation on the system and operated it for 1 minute to collect data when it was stable. Results The front swing strength and back swing strength of Z axis, X axis and Y axis in practice group and teacher group was significantly greater than learning group, while the front swing strength and back swing strength of Z axis and Y axis in teachers group was significantly greater than practice group (P<0.01). There were no significant differences on front swing strength and back swing strength of X axis between practice group and teachers group (P>0.05). The frequency of practice group was significantly shorter than learning group, while the frequency of teachers group was significantly shorter than practice group (P<0.01). Conclusion Strength of rolling manipulation of teachers group is stronger, more uniform, more coherent and more stable than practice group and learning group. Frequency of rolling manipulation in teacher group is quicker than practice group and learning group. The stimulation quantity of teachers group is more powerful than the other two groups. This study provides visual oscillogram and objective parameters for rolling manipulation teaching method. |
| Key words: rolling manipulation massage measurement system strength in various directions cycle |
|
二维码（扫一下试试看！） |
|
|
|
|
