| 引用本文: |
冯丽芝,周青山,夏文芳,王常永.改良经皮气管切开术在危重症患者中的应用效果[J].湖南中医药大学学报,2017,37(9):989-991[点击复制] |
|
| |
|
|
| 本文已被：浏览 1760次 下载 515次 |
| 改良经皮气管切开术在危重症患者中的应用效果 |
| 冯丽芝,周青山,夏文芳,王常永 |
| (武汉大学人民医院重症医学科, 湖北 武汉 430060) |
| 摘要: |
| 目的 观察比较改良经皮气管切开术在危重症患者中的应用效果。方法 收集2015年1月至2016年1月期间我院重症监护病房（ICU）行经皮气管切开术的120例患者的临床资料，随机分为Portex法经皮气管切开术组60例和改良经皮气管切开术组60例，对两组患者的性别、年龄、体质量指数（BMI）、APCHEⅡ评分等一般情况和两组患者手术所需时间、手术切口大小、术中出血量、拔除气管套管后切口愈合时间以及手术后并发症的发生率进行比较。结果 Portex法经皮气管切开术组与改良经皮气管切开术组相比较，两组患者在性别、年龄、体重指数（BMI）、APCHEⅡ评分等指标方面差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；与Portex法经皮气管切开术组相比较，改良经皮气管切开术组手术时间、术中出血量明显减少（P<0.05），差异有统计学意义，但两组患者的切口大小、切口愈合时间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；改良经皮气管切开术组与Portex法经皮气管切开术组相比，气管后壁损伤或穿孔的发生率明显减少，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 改良经皮气管切开术与Portex法经皮气管切开术相比较，可节约手术时间、减少术中出血量、减少气管后壁损伤或穿孔的发生率，值得临床推广应用。 |
| 关键词: Portex经皮气管切开术 改良经皮气管切开术 危重症患者 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-070X.2017.09.018 |
| 投稿时间：2017-03-27 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Application Effect of Modified Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy in the Treatment of Critically Ill Patients |
| FENG Lizhi,ZHOU Qingshan,XIA Wenfang,WANG Changyong |
| (Intensive Care Unit, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, China) |
| Abstract: |
| Objective To compare the application effect of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy and modified percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in the treatment of critically ill patients. Methods A total of 120 critically ill patients undergoing tracheotomy were selected, and they were divided two groups according to the methods of tracheotomy. The sex, age, body mass index, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, operation time, incision size, intraoperative blood loss, incision healing time, incidence of complications after operation were compared between the two groups. Results There were no statistically significant differences of sex, age, weight, body mass index, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation between Portex percutaneous dilational tracheostomy group (group A) and modified percutaneous dilational tracheostomy group (group B) (P>0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of group B were significantly shorter than those of group A (P<0.05), and the incision size and incision healing time in the two groups have no statistically significance (P>0.05). Compared with group A, tracheal wall injury or perforration of group B were significantly improved (P<0.05). Conclusion The modified percutaneous dilational tracheostomy could save operation time, reduce intraoperative blood loss and tracheal wall injury or perforration, so it's worth of clinical application. |
| Key words: Portex percutaneous dilational tracheostomy modified percutaneous dilational tracheostomy critically ill patients |
|
二维码（扫一下试试看！） |
|
|
|
|
